Fact Sheet

Institutional Capacity Building

Introduction to Institutional Capacity Building

Over the past decades the terms “Organisational Development” and “Institutional Development” have been used to describe the support provided by donors to their partners. These activities have usually had a focus on the organisation (such as a government department) as a unit in which all resources were equally assessed in relation to the products or services delivered (within the overall institution, such as the HMGN “system”). The rapidly changing context in the political arena in recent years, in particular the democratisation and decentralisation processes, has huge implications for the social sector and in particular for local level public sector institutions. This has focussed attention on the approach adopted to institutional development in recognition of the fact that in order for any local development activity to be sustainable, the role and capacity of organisations have to be addressed in relation to its institutional setting.

At the dawn of the 21st century donors and recipient countries realise the need not only to empower communities but also to provide them with the necessary institutional capacities to take their destiny into their own hands.

Today, international institutions, such as donor agencies, put strong emphasis on Capacity Building.  But what it signifies and how it is understood is still an ongoing debate. This Briefing clarifies how RAP understands its Institutional Capacity Building activities.

Institutional Capacity Building in the RAP context

  • What does RAP mean by Institutional Capacity Building? 

Institutional Capacity can be seen as an asset. Activities and actions are executed by a particular organisation to deliver a service to customers. Within an organisation, services are delivered by the people working there. Consequently when we talk about Institutional Capacity we must start by focussing on the individual people working for the particular organisation. Capacity in an organisation is not necessarily linked to the number of persons but to the efficiency with which each individual or group performs a particular task. Institutional Capacity should also encompass the ability to interact and co-ordinate with external organisations and stakeholders.

RAP, in its approach to Institutional Capacity Building, does not only consider the task to be performed by an individual, but looks beyond and promotes a whole set of skills necessary for adequate performance. An organisation consists of a number of persons who work together. For a group to be efficient and effective one has to assess the personal inter-relationships and the processes used for sharing information among the group members.

In its efforts to assess the capacity and needs of an institution RAP goes beyond the mere investigation of individual employees’ skills and know-how. RAP considers the institution as a system, where a number of stakeholders interact in their efforts to add value for its “customers”. Therefore, Institutional Capacity Building is not only transferring skills through training interventions but also assessing and addressing the organisation’s needs, to enable it to add value. RAP provides its partners with the required “hardware” (infrastructure and equipment) and “software” (skills and know-how) to perform its tasks effectively. Together these should assist each organisation to operate a system that performs satisfactorily.

Capacity Building is closely associated with behavioural change at the individual level. RAP considers Institutional Capacity Building not only as an enhancement of skills and knowledge but also as a change in the individual’s, and therefore the organisation’s, attitude towards the development of civil society. HMGN is well aware off the needs to change individuals’ attitudes and has started to support “Change Units” within several ministries to initiate and co-ordinate the process of change at institutional level. Changes in attitudes, behaviour and culture do not materialise overnight. Institutional Capacity Building is therefore a long-term, process-oriented approach.

  • Objectives of Institutional Capacity Building

The aim of the Institutional Capacity Building component within RAP is to strengthen government, private and social sector organisations, and their staff, to enable them to deliver essential services to the rural communities of Nepal and manage them in a sustainable manner.

  • Approaches taken by RAP in Institutional Capacity Building

To achieve the objective described above, RAP will conduct studies to analyse the existing level of skills and know-how within the collaborating institutions, and compare the outcome with the requirements needed to implement the RAP approach in their zone of influence. This will be the foundation for developing interventions to increase the individual’s professional capacity and modify the organisation’s procedures for achieving its objectives.

An inquiry into the organisational set-up, vision, mission and goal will be made for analysing opportunities to improve internal procedures, and therefore make the whole organisation more efficient in delivering its services to the community.

To help promote sustainability, RAP will, together with its partner organisations, develop action plans for the introduction of the agreed organisational changes. Then it will establish and support a rigorous coaching programme to secure the institutionalisation of the acquired skills and knowledge. Sharing of lessons learned in the field of organisational change with the broader audience will support the replication of the approach in different parts of Nepal.

Constant monitoring of the process will ensure the implementation of the planned actions, which will be verified against clear performance indicators. Feedback from the full spectrum of stakeholders should be the guiding principle to adjust the action plans according to the evolving environment and expressed needs of the beneficiaries.

Other useful documents on Institutional Capacity Building

Click to open or save these documents:  

  • Best Practice - Institutional Development Activities (pdf  119k)

  • District Information - Overview of NGO Training Needs Assessments in Bhojpur, Khotang and Doti (pdf  93k)

  • District Information - Overview of DDC Capacity Assessment in Bhojpur, Khotang, Doti and Sankhuwasabha (pdf  112k)

  •  Position Paper - Geographical Information Systems in RAP districts (pdf  118k)

  • Position Paper - Local Institutions and Committees (pdf  162k)

  • Guideline - RAP Operation Manual (pdf  317k)

BACK TO TOP